Foster and Catchings

原ページ
 
Google
WWW 検索 cruel.org 検索
Foster and Catching's


Pre-Keynesian American underconsumption theorists, their main theses being worked out in Profits (1925) and Money (1928). They argued that insufficient consumer income is what leads to collapses in consumption and hence profits, prices and outputs. They base their theory on a primitive but clumsy version of a multiplier-accelerator mechanism. If retained company profits are hoarded (rather than being lent out), then consumer income is insufficient for consumers to absorb output. They argued that even if the firm invests this hoarded money itself (and thus pays the income out to workers), the problem is not solved: increased investment increases demand, yes, but it also pushes out output even further. The imbalance between aggregate demand and supply, Foster and Catchings argue, will thus maintain itself.

Their theory contains a fatal flaw in the "long-run", but seen in a short-run, dynamic manner, it is reminiscent of that of Malthus during the General Glut controversy. They publicly offered a cash award to any economist who could prove their argument flawed. Dozens upon dozens of people submitted proofs (e.g. Friedrich Hayek, 1929), but while they acknowledged minor errors, Foster and Catchings maintained that their central thesis remained correct. Apparently, Foster and Catchings had early sympathizers in Paul H. Douglas and Charles F. Roos.

William Trufant Foster, 1879-1950.

Waddill Catchings, 1879-1969.- (1)

Resources on Foster and Catchings


ホーム 学者一覧 (ABC) 学派あれこれ 参考文献 原サイト (英語)
連絡先 学者一覧 (50音) トピック解説 リンク フレーム版

免責条項© 2002-2004 Gonçalo L. Fonseca, Leanne Ussher, 山形浩生