Let us start with a definition:
Homogeneity: Let ヲ :Rn ョ R be a real-valued function. Then ヲ (x1, x2 ...., xn) is homogeneous of degree k if lkヲ(x) = ヲ(l x) where l ウ 0 (x is the vector [x1...xn]).
In other words, a function is called homogeneous of degree k if by multiplying all arguments by a constant scalar l , we increase the value of the function by lk, i.e.
lkヲ(x1, x2,..., xn) = ヲ(lx1, lx2,...., lxn)
If k = 1, we call this a linearly homogenous function. If we interpret ヲ(x) as a production function, then k = 1 implies constant returns to scale (as lk = l), k > 1 implies increasing returns to scale (as lk > l) and if 0 < k < 1, then we have decreasing returns to scale (as lk < l).
Phillip Wicksteed (1894) stated the "product exhaustion" thesis implied by the marginal productivity theory of distribution - namely, that if all agents were paid their marginal product, then total costs would exhaust the entire product. Wicksteed assumed constant returns to scale - and thus employed a linear homogeneous production function, a function which was homogeneous of degree one. It was A.W. Flux (1894) who pointed out that Wicksteed's "product exhaustion" thesis was merely a restatement of Euler's Theorem. Eulers Theorem states that under homogeneity of degree 1, a function ヲ (x) can be reduced to the sum of its arguments multiplied by their first partial derivatives, in short:
Theorem: (Euler's Theorem) Given the function ヲ :Rn ョ R, then if ヲ is positively homogeneous of degree 1 then:
ヲ (x1, x2, ...., xn) = x1 [カ ヲ /カ x1] + x2 [カ ヲ /カ x2] + ...... + xn [カ ヲ /dカxn]
or simply:
ヲ (x) = ・/font> ni=1 [dヲ (x)/dxi]キxi
Proof: By definition of homogeneity of degree k, letting k = 1, then l ヲ (x) = ヲ (l x) where x is a n-dimensional vector and l is a scalar. Differentiating both sides of this expression with respect to xi and using the chain rule, we see that:
[カ l ヲ (x)/カ ヲ (x)]キ[カ ヲ (x)/カ xi] = [カ ヲ (l x)/カ (l xi)]キ[カ (l xi)/カ xi]
as [カ l ヲ (x)/カ ヲ (x)] = l and カ (l xi)/カ xi = l then l [カ ヲ (x)/カ xi] = [カ ヲ (l x)/カ (l xi)]l then:
カ ヲ (x)/カ xi = カ ヲ (l x)/カ (l xi) (E.1)
Now, differentiating both sides of the original expression l ヲ (x) = ヲ (l x) with respect to l , we get:
カ l ヲ (x)/カ l = ・/font> ni=1[カ ヲ (l x)/カ (l xi)]キ[カ (l xi)/カ l ]
As カ l ヲ (xi)/カ l = ヲ (xi) and カ (l xi)/カ l = xi for all i = 1,..., n, then this expression reduces to:
ヲ (x) = ・/font> ni=1[カ ヲ (l x)/カ (l xi)]キxi
Now using the equality in (E.1), we can substitute カ ヲ (x)/カ xi for カ ヲ (l x)/カ (l xi). Thus, this becomes:
ヲ (x) = ・/font> ni=1[カ ヲ (x)/カ xi]キxi
which is Eulers Theorem.ァ
One of the interesting results is that if ヲ(x) is a homogeneous function of degree k, then the first derivatives, ヲi(x), are themselves homogeneous functions of degree k-1. So, for the homogeneous of degree 1 case, ヲ i(x) is homogeneous of degree zero. Consequently, there is a corollary to Euler's Theorem:
Corollary: if ヲ :Rn ョ R is homogenous of degree 1, then ・/font> ni=1[カ2ヲ(x)/カ xiカxj]xi = 0 for any j.
Proof: By Eulers Theorem, ヲ (x) = ・/font> ni=1[カ ヲ (x)/カ xi]キxi . Differentiating with respect to xj yields:
カ ヲ (x)/カ xj = [カ 2ヲ (x)/カ x1カxj]x1 + ..... + [カ 2ヲ (x)/カ xjカxj]xj + カ ヲ (x)/カ xj + ..... + [カ 2ヲ (x)/カ xnカxj]xn
or rewriting:
カ ヲ (x)/カ xj = ・/font> ni=1[カ 2ヲ (x)/カ xi カxj]xi + カ ヲ (x)/カ xj
where, note, the summation expression sums from all i from 1 to n (including i = j). Nonetheless, note that the expression on the extreme right, カ ヲ (x)/カ xj appears on both sides of the equation. Thus:
・/font> ni=1[カ 2ヲ (x)/カ xiカxj]xi = 0
which is what we sought.ァ
| Selected References |
|